Cost of the War in Iraq
(JavaScript Error)

Fontsize: A A A
Newton Dialogues on Peace and War

Search Our Site

Links to Features of Our Site

Speeches
Up
Leslie Burg, Newton's Iraq Resolution
Bill Moyers, Restoring The Public Trust
Bill Moyers June 4, 2003
Howard Zinn at Spelman College
Bill Moyers May 15, 2005
Bill Moyers December 1, 2004
Sen Byrd Oct 17, 2003
Sen Byrd April 7, 2004
MP George Galloway Senate Testimony
MP George Galloway interview by Amy Goodman
Al Gore Nov 29 ,2003
Kennedy Oct 16, 2003
Kennedy Jan 14, 2004
Kennedy March 5, 2004
Kennedy: America's Future in Iraq
Mark Dayton Opposing Ms. Rice
Martin Luther King: Beyond Vietnam
Iraq Veterans Against the War
Howard Zinn at Spelman College
Opposing the Nomination of Condoleeza Rice.
 
by Mark Dayton, U.S. Senator from Minnesota
 

Speech to US Senate on January 27, 2005

 
THANK YOU, MR. PRESIDENT. I RISE TODAY TO ALSO OPPOSE THE NOMINATION OF NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER CONDOLEEZZA RICE FOR SECRETARY OF STATE.

I DO SO, BECAUSE SHE MISLED ME ABOUT THE SITUATION IN IRAQ BEFORE AND AFTER THE CONGRESSIONAL RESOLUTION IN OCTOBER, 2002, AUTHORIZING THAT WAR, A RESOLUTION THAT I OPPOSED. SHE MISLED OTHER MEMBERS OF CONGRESS ABOUT THE SITUATION IN IRAQ, MEMBERS WHO HAVE SAID THAT THEY WOULD HAVE OPPOSED THAT RESOLUTION IF THEY HAD BEEN TOLD THE TRUTH. AND SHE MISLED THE PEOPLE OF MINNESOTA AND AMERICANS EVERYWHERE ABOUT THE SITUATION IN IRAQ, BEFORE AND AFTER THAT WAR BEGAN.

IT IS A WAR IN WHICH 1,372 AMERICAN SOLDIERS HAVE LOST THEIR LIVES AND OVER 10,000 HAVE BEEN WOUNDED, MANY OF THEM MAIMED FOR LIFE. THOUSANDS MORE HAVE BEEN SCARRED EMOTIONALLY AND PHYSICALLY. ALL OF THEIR FAMILIES AND MANY THOUSANDS OF OTHER AMERICAN FAMILIES WHOSE LOVED ONES ARE NOW SERVING IN IRAQ, WHO ARE SUFFERING SERIOUS FINANCIAL AND FAMILY HARDSHIPS, WHO MUST WONDER AND WORRY EVERY DAY AND NIGHT FOR A YEAR OR LONGER WHETHER THEIR HUSBANDS, WIVES, FATHERS, MOTHERS, SONS, AND DAUGHTERS ARE STILL ALIVE, WILL STAY ALIVE, AND WONDER WHEN THEY WILL BE COMING HOME.

FOR MANY, THE ANSWER IS NOT SOON ENOUGH. I READ IN TODAY'S "WASHINGTON POST" THAT THE ARMY IS PLANNING TO KEEP ITS CURRENT TROOP STRENGTH IN IRAQ AT 120,000 FOR AT LEAST TWO MORE YEARS. I DID NOT LEARN THAT INFORMATION AS A MEMBER OF CONGRESS. I DID NOT LEARN IT AS A MEMBER OF THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE, WHERE I REGULARLY ATTEND PUBLIC HEARINGS, CLASSIFIED MEETINGS, AND TOP SECRET BRIEFINGS. I DID NOT LEARN IT FROM THE U.S. MILITARY COMMAND IN IRAQ, WITH WHOM I MET IN BAGHDAD LAST MONTH. I READ IT IN "THE WASHINGTON POST". JUST AS I READ LAST WEEKEND THAT THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE HAS CREATED HIS OWN NEW ESPIONAGE ARM BY -- QUOTE -- "REINTERPRETING AN EXISTING LAW." WITHOUT INFORMING MOST, IF ANY, MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AND BY REPORTEDLY -- QUOTE -- "REPROGRAMMING FUNDS APPROPRIATED FOR OTHER PURPOSES."

JUST AS I LEARNED LAST WEEKEND BY READING "THE NEW YORK TIMES" THAT SECRET U.S. COMMANDO UNITS ARE OPERATING IN THIS COUNTRY BASED ON THE ADMINISTRATION'S REINTERPRETATION OF ANOTHER LAW. OR I ALSO LEARNED OF OFFICIAL REPORTS DOCUMENTING HORRIBLE ABUSES OF

PRISONERS, INNOCENT CIVILIANS AS WELL AS ENEMY COMBATANTS AT NUMEROUS LOCATIONS IN COUNTRIES BESIDES THE ABU GHRAIB PRISON

IN IRAQ, WHICH DIRECTLY CONTRADICTS ASSURANCES WE HAVE BEEN GIVEN REPEATEDLY BY ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS IN THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE.

I MIGHT AS WELL SKIP ALL THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE HEARINGS AND MEETINGS AND TOP SECRET BRIEFINGS AND JUST READ THE PAPERS. AND THANK GOODNESS FOR A FREE AND VIGILANT PRESS TO FERRET OUT THE TRUTH AND TO REPORT THE TRUTH, BECAUSE WE CANNOT GET THE TRUTH FROM THIS ADMINISTRATION.

AND, SADLY, THE ATTITUDE OF TOO MANY OF MY COLLEAGUES ACROSS THE AISLE IS: OUR PRESIDENT WRONG, WRONG, OR WRONG. THEY DEFEND HIM. THEY PROTECT HIM. AND THEY ALLOW HIS TOP ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS TO GET AWAY WITH LYING. LYING TO CONGRESS, LYING TO OUR COMMITTEES, AND LYING TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. IT'S WRONG. IT'S IMMORAL. IT'S UN-AMERICAN. AND IT HAS TO STOP.

IT STOPS BY NOT PROMOTING TOP ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS WHO ENGAGE IN THE PRACTICE, WHO HAVE BEEN INSTRUMENTAL IN DECEIVING CONGRESS AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, AND REGRETTABLY THAT INCLUDES DR. RICE.

DR. RICE STATED IN A TELEVISION INTERVIEW ON DECEMBER 8, 2002, AS THE ADMINISTRATION WAS LAUNCHING ITS CAMPAIGN TO SCARE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND STAMPEDE CONGRESS ABOUT SADDAM HUSSEIN'S SUPPOSEDLY URGENT THREAT TO OUR NATIONAL SECURITY. SHE SHREWDLY INVOKED THE ULTIMATE THREAT THAT HE POSSESSED OR WOULD SOON POSSESS NUCLEAR WEAPONS. SHE SAID THAT DAY -- QUOTE -- "WE DON'T WANT THE SMOKING GUN TO BE A MUSHROOM CLOUD."

SOON THEREAFTER, SHE AND OTHER TOP ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS CITED INTERCEPTED ALUMINUM TUBES AS DEFINITE PROOF THAT SADDAM HUSSEIN HAD AN ACTIVE NUCLEAR WEAPONS PROGRAM UNDER WAY. DR. RICE STATED PUBLICLY AT THE TIME -- QUOTE -- "THE TUBES ARE ONLY REALLY SUITED FOR NUCLEAR WEAPONS PROGRAMS, CENTRIFUGE PROGRAMS."

IN LATE SEPTEMBER OF 2002, SHORTLY BEFORE WE IN CONGRESS WERE TO VOTE ON THE IRAQ WAR RESOLUTION, DR. RICE INVITED ME ALONG WITH, I BELIEVE, FIVE OF MY SENATE COLLEAGUES TO THE WHITE HOUSE, WHERE WE WERE BRIEFED BY HER AND THEN-C.I.A. DIRECTOR GEORGE TENET. THAT BRIEFING WAS CLASSIFIED. WHAT I WAS SHOWN AND TOLD CONFORMED TO DR. RICE'S PUBLIC STATEMENTS WITH NO QUALIFICATIONS WHATSOEVER.

NOW, OF COURSE, WE HAVE BEEN TOLD AFTER AN EXHAUSTIVE SEARCH FOR 18 MONTHS BY OVER 1,400 UNITED STATES WEAPONS INSPECTORS THAT SADDAM HUSSEIN DID NOT HAVE AN ACTIVE NUCLEAR WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM UNDER WAY AND THAT HE, APPARENTLY, POSSESSED NO WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION OF ANY KIND.

WE'VE ALSO BEEN TOLD THAT IN THE FALL OF 2002, RIGHT AT THE TIME OF MY MEETING IN THE WHITE HOUSE, RIGHT AT THE TIME OF THE SENATE AND HOUSE VOTES ON THE IRAQ WAR RESOLUTION, THE TOP NUCLEAR EXPERTS AT THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND OFFICIALS IN OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES WERE DISAGREEING STRONGLY WITH DR. RICE'S CLAIM THAT THOSE ALUMINUM TUBES COULD ONLY HAVE BEEN INTENDED FOR USE IN DEVELOPING NUCLEAR WEAPONS MATERIALS. THAT EXPERT DISSENT AND HONEST DISAGREEMENT, A DIFFERENT POINT OF VIEW, WAS NOT COMMUNICATED TO ME; NOR WAS IT BROUGHT TO ME LATER, IF IT WAS NOT KNOWN AT THE TIME. I RECEIVED NO PHONE CALL OR LETTER TO SAY, NO, SENATOR DAYTON, I JUST WANTED TO CORRECT A MISIMPRESSION THAT I GAVE YOU AT THAT MEETING. I NOW HAVE INFORMATION THAT CONTRADICTS WHAT YOU WERE TOLD THEN. I STILL BELIEVE IN MY OWN VIEW, BUT I WANT YOU TO BE AWARE OF OTHERS BEFORE YOU CAST THE MOST IMPORTANT VOTE IN YOUR SENATE CAREER. OR EVEN A CALL OR COMMUNICATION AFTER THAT VOTE WAS CAST, THERE WAS NOTHING.

WHEN SENATOR BOXER PROPERLY PRESSED DR. RICE ON THIS POINT IN THE FOREIGN RELATIONS CONFIRMATION HEARING, THERE WAS NO ADMISSION EVEN THEN OF ANY MISTAKE. IN FACT, SHE REPLIED, -- QUOTE – "SENATOR, I REALLY HOPE THAT YOU WILL REFRAIN FROM IMPUGNING MY INTEGRITY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH."

WELL, THERE'S A SAYING THAT WE JUDGE OURSELVES BY OUR INTENTIONS; OTHERS JUDGE US BY OUR ACTIONS. I DON'T KNOW WHAT DR. RICE'S INTENTIONS WERE, BUT I DO HAVE DIRECT EXPERIENCE WITH HER ACTIONS. THIS WAS NO SLIGHT MISUNDERSTANDING OR SLIP OR EVEN A MISTAKE THAT WAS LIMITED TO ONE MEETING. THIS WAS A PUBLIC STATEMENT MADE REPEATEDLY BY DR. RICE.

IN SIMILAR WORDS BY VICE PRESIDENT CHENEY AND EVEN BY PRESIDENT BUSH AS PART OF AN ALL-OUT CAMPAIGN WHICH CONTINUES EVEN TO TODAY TO MOBILIZE PUBLIC SUPPORT AND MAINTAIN PUBLIC SUPPORT FOR THE INVASION OF IRAQ AND FOR THE CONTINUING WAR THERE, REGARDLESS OF WHAT THE FACTS WERE THEN OR ARE NOW. AND IT'S BEEN DONE BY MISREPRESENTING THOSE FACTS, BY DISTORTING THE FACTS, BY WITHHOLDING THE FACTS, BY HIDING THE TRUTH. BY HIDING THE TRUTH IN MATTERS OF LIFE AND DEATH, OF WAR AND PEACE, THAT PROFOUNDLY AFFECT OUR NATIONAL SECURITY, OUR INTERNATIONAL REPUTATION, AND OUR FUTURE WELL-BEING. AND WILL FOR MANY YEARS TO COME.

I DON'T LIKE TO IMPUGN ANYONE'S INTEGRITY, BUT I REALLY DON'T LIKE BEING LIED TO REPEATEDLY, FLAGRANTLY, INTENTIONALLY. IT'S WRONG. IT'S UNDEMOCRATIC, IT'S UN-AMERICAN, AND IT'S DANGEROUS. IT IS VERY, VERY DANGEROUS. AND IT IS OCCURRING FAR TOO FREQUENTLY IN THIS ADMINISTRATION. AND THIS CONGRESS, THIS SENATE MUST DEMAND THAT IT STOP NOW.

MY VOTE AGAINST THIS NOMINATION IS MY STATEMENT THAT THIS ADMINISTRATION'S LYING MUST STOP NOW. I URGE MY COLLEAGUES TO JOIN ME IN THIS DEMAND, DEMOCRATS, REPUBLICANS, INDEPENDENTS; WE ARE ALL, ALL OF US, FIRST AND FOREMOST AMERICANS. WE MUST BE TOLD THE TRUTH, IF WE'RE TO GOVERN OUR COUNTRY AND TO PRESERVE OUR WORLD, AND THAT'S WHY WE MUST VOTE AGAINST THIS NOMINATION.